On 10/10, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > The freeze suggestion from Ingo would actually work because we freeze > tasks at known good points
Not really known/good, we have more and more freezable_schedule's. But probably this is fine, nobody should do this under get_online_cpus(). > (userspace and kthread_freeze() points) where > we know they're not fiddling with per-cpu state. We should also take care of PF_NOFREEZE kthreads. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
