On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:38:04PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 09/10/13 13:12, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:33:25AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > >> On 08/10/13 17:02, Jiri Olsa wrote: > >>> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:45:50AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
SNIP > > > > so.. the name of the section, name of the <function> plus the first > > instruction decode seem wrong.. I can see that in every symbol I > > annotate in the report and in annotate command as well. > > If you use the --asm-raw option you can see the bytes: > > 66 66 66 90 > > That looks like a "nop" e.g. K8_NOP4 in arch/x86/include/asm/nops.h > hum, wierd for all those functions to start with nop ok, how about the '<load0>' function name? thanks, jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
