On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:01:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:47:18PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > To me it would sure look nice to have kernel/rcu/tree.c,
> > kernel/rcu/tiny.c, kernel/rcu/core.c, etc.
> >
> > [ ... and we would certainly also break new ground by introducing a
> > "torture.c" file, for the first time in Linux kernel history! ;-) ]
> >
> > But it's really your call, this is something you should only do if you are
> > comfortable with it.
>
> IFF we're going to restructure rcu; can we save the CPP some work and do
> away with rcu*_plugin.h ?
OK, I'll bite... Where did you want to put the code instead?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
