On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:05:16PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> In certain occasions it is possible for a hung task detector
> positive to be false: continuation from a paused VM, for example.
>
> Add a method to reset detection, similar as is done
> with other kernel watchdogs.
This makes sense to me. Should we throw the 'reset_hung_task_detector' in
include/linux/sched.h like some of the other watchdog functions? Or is
having a small hung_task.h file like this fine?
Cheers,
Don
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com>
>
> Index: kvm/kernel/hung_task.c
> ===================================================================
> --- kvm.orig/kernel/hung_task.c
> +++ kvm/kernel/hung_task.c
> @@ -203,6 +203,14 @@ int proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs(struct
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static atomic_t reset_hung_task = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> +
> +void reset_hung_task_detector(void)
> +{
> + atomic_set(&reset_hung_task, 1);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reset_hung_task_detector);
> +
> /*
> * kthread which checks for tasks stuck in D state
> */
> @@ -216,6 +224,9 @@ static int watchdog(void *dummy)
> while (schedule_timeout_interruptible(timeout_jiffies(timeout)))
> timeout = sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs;
>
> + if (atomic_xchg(&reset_hung_task, 0))
> + continue;
> +
> check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(timeout);
> }
>
> Index: kvm/include/linux/hung_task.h
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null
> +++ kvm/include/linux/hung_task.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/*
> + * linux/include/linux/hung_task.h
> + */
> +#ifndef LINUX_HUNG_TASK_H
> +#define LINUX_HUNG_TASK_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK
> +void reset_hung_task_detector(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void reset_hung_task_detector(void)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
