On 10/06/2013 12:30 AM, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag
>
> It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
Laxman, care to comment? I'm not sure why the code explicitly specifies
IRQF_DISABLED if it's already a no-op. Perhaps the code expects
IRQF_DISABLED to do something, and hence there's some bug that needs to
be fixed because of it doesn't?
> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
> b/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
> index 0489a2b..dfe79cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
> @@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ static int tegra_uart_startup(struct uart_port *u)
> goto fail_hw_init;
> }
>
> - ret = request_irq(u->irq, tegra_uart_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
> + ret = request_irq(u->irq, tegra_uart_isr, 0,
> dev_name(u->dev), tup);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(u->dev, "Failed to register ISR for IRQ %d\n", u->irq);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
