On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:21:42PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:53:35PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > The warning for the irq remapping broken check in intel_irq_remapping.c is
> > pretty pointless.  We need the warning, but we know where its comming from, 
> > the
> > stack trace will always be the same, and it needlessly triggers things like
> > Abrt.  This changes the warning to just print a text warning about BIOS 
> > being
> > broken, without the stack trace, then sets the appropriate taint bit.  
> > Since we
> > automatically disable irq remapping, theres no need to contiue making Abrt 
> > jump
> > at this problem
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com>
> > CC: Joerg Roedel <j...@8bytes.org>
> > CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
> > CC: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
> > CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
> > CC: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebast...@breakpoint.cc>
> 
> Ping Bjorn, Jeorg, any thoughts here?

Yes, the patch is doing the right thing. I have it already on my list
and will merge it soon.


        Joerg


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to