On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:19:14AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/26/2013 08:17 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >On 26 September 2013 04:00, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>If you introduce a list, you will have to introduce a lock to protect
> >>it.
> >
> >I missed it, should have added that :)
> >
> >>This lock will be in the fast path cpuidle_idle_call with the
> >>get_driver function and conforming to the comment: "NOTE: no locks or
> >>semaphores should be used here".
> >>
> >>A lock has been introduced in this function already and the system hangs
> >>with 1024 cpus.
> >
> >Hmm... I see.. I didn't knew about this expectation.. What about a rcu
> >read/write lock? As far as I know its too lightweight... Can we have that
> >in fast path?
>
> Nope, we can't use rcu in the idle path :)
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-February/083054.html
But you should be able to use SRCU in the idle path, if that helps.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
