* Mike Travis <tra...@sgi.com> wrote:

> On 9/24/2013 12:52 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > Hm, do you test-build your patches? 
> 
> Both build and test incessantly...
> 
> This series produces the following
> > annoying warning:
> > 
> >  arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c: In function ‘uv_nmi_setup’:
> >  arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c:664:2: warning: the address of 
> > ‘uv_nmi_cpu_mask’ will always evaluate as ‘true’ [-Waddress]
> 
> I didn't hit the above warning since I never tried building without 
> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK defined. [...]

Ok, that explains it!

> [...]  I wonder if uv_nmi.c should not be built if not on an enterprise 
> sized system?

I don't think so - the config variations help root out such bugs.

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to