On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 09/20/2013 08:51 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> sa11x0_pcmcia_init() which starts this chain of events is called as >> an fs_initcall(), see drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_generic.c > > But fs_initcall() comes after arch_initcall() right? (looking at > include/linux/init.h). Since the corresponding cpufreq-driver (drivers/ > cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c) uses arch_initcall() to register itself, it > is all the more surprising how this could happen... Hm it does happen if the cpufreq driver does not probe *at all* right? I will look closer at this, maybe it just doesn't register properly for some SA1100 variants... Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
