On 20 September 2013 14:03, Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> wrote:
> I suspect this hunk from the patch may be the cause:
>
> + if (cpufreq_driver) {
> + /* get the CPU */
> + policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
> + if (policy)
> + kobject_get(&policy->kobj);
> + }
>
> - /* get the CPU */
> - policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
>
> As you see we *always* set a policy pointer before this patch,
> but after this patch we only do it if we have a cpufreq driver
> registered!
Not really!! See this few lines above:
- if (!cpufreq_driver)
- goto err_out_unlock;
-
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
