Em Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 07:19:12PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu:
> This patchset is a first in a series of perf-lock enhancements I am working
> on. Overall it is pretty straightforward, dealing with cleanups, and some
> cosmetic changes.
> 
> Patches 1-3 deal with some minor fixes and cleanups.
> 
> Patch 4 fixes a segfault in the report command when the perf.data
> file is generated by a non perf-lock command.
> 
> Patch 5 and 6 are cosmetic changes.

Applied all but patch 5, since Mitake-san had concerns about it, lemme
know if that changed.

Thanks!

- Arnaldo
 
> Patch 7 allows the tool to report the average wait times.
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Davidlohr Bueso (7):
>   perf lock: remove dead code
>   perf lock: return proper code in report_lock_*_event
>   perf lock: plug some memleaks
>   perf lock: redo __cmd_report
>   perf lock: do not cut lock name
>   perf lock: limit bad rate precision
>   perf lock: account for lock average wait time
> 
>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-lock.txt |   2 +-
>  tools/perf/builtin-lock.c              | 142 
> ++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to