Hi! > > You know about this project no doubt: > > > > http://noflushd.sourceforge.net/ > > Only vaguely. It's huge. Over 2300 lines of C code and >560 lines in > .h files! As you say, not really lightweight. There must be a better > way. Also, I suspect (without having looked at the code) that it > doesn't handle memory pressure well. Things may get nasty when we run > low on free pages. Noflushd *is* lightweight. It is complicated because it has to know about different kernel versions etc. It is "easy stuff". If you add kernel support, it will only *add* lines to noflushd. Pavel -- The best software in life is free (not shareware)! Pavel GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: (lkml)Re: spindown [was Re: 2.4.6-pre2, pre3 VM Be... Mike Galbraith
- Re: spindown [was Re: 2.4.6-pre2, pre3 VM Behavior] Daniel Phillips
- Re: spindown [was Re: 2.4.6-pre2, pre3 VM Behavior] Mike Galbraith
- [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Richard Gooch
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Richard Gooch
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Daniel Kobras
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Pavel Machek
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Pavel Machek
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Tom Sightler
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Anuradha Ratnaweera
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown) Daniel Phillips
- Re: spindown Simon Huggins
- Re: spindown Pavel Machek
- Re: spindown Daniel Phillips
- Re: spindown Rik van Riel