On 20010621 Stephen Satchell wrote: > >By the way, I'm surprised no one has mentioned that a synonym for "thread" >is "lightweight process". > In linux. Perhaps this the fault. In IRIX, you have sprocs and threads. sprocs have independent pids and you can control what you share (mappings, fd table...). Threads group under same pid. Linux chose the sproc way... -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Mandrake release 8.1 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.5-ac15 #2 SMP Sun Jun 17 02:12:45 CEST 2001 i686 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Jes Sorensen
- Threads are processes that share more bert hubert
- Re: Threads are processes that share more Alexander Viro
- Re: Threads are processes that share more Martin Devera
- Unknown PCI Net Device Greg Ingram
- Re: Unknown PCI Net Device Andreas Dilger
- Re: Unknown PCI Net Device Jeff Garzik
- Re: Unknown PCI Net Device Alan Cox
- Re: Threads are processes that share more Stephen Satchell
- Re: Threads are processes that share mor... ognen
- Re: Threads are processes that share mor... J . A . Magallon
- Re: Threads are processes that shar... Larry McVoy
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Joerg Pommnitz
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Chris Ricker
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Mike Castle
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Mike Porter
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Jes Sorensen