On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 04:03:06PM +0800, Dong Zhu wrote:
> This patch add a method into testptp.c to measure the time offset
> between phc and system clock through the ioctl PTP_SYS_OFFSET.
>
This is a nice addition to the testptp program. I do have a few
comments, below.
First off, the subject line should mention testptp. How about this?
[PATCH] ptp: add the PTP_SYS_OFFSET ioctl to the testptp program
> Signed-off-by: Dong Zhu <bluezhud...@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/ptp/testptp.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ptp/testptp.c b/Documentation/ptp/testptp.c
> index f59ded0..72bb030 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ptp/testptp.c
> +++ b/Documentation/ptp/testptp.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ static void usage(char *progname)
> " -f val adjust the ptp clock frequency by 'val' ppb\n"
> " -g get the ptp clock time\n"
> " -h prints this message\n"
> + " -k val measure the time offset between PHC and system
> clock\n"
The help message should tell the user what 'val' is.
> " -p val enable output with a period of 'val' nanoseconds\n"
> " -P val enable or disable (val=1|0) the system clock PPS\n"
> " -s set the ptp clock time from the system time\n"
> @@ -133,8 +134,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> struct itimerspec timeout;
> struct sigevent sigevent;
>
> + struct ptp_clock_time *pct;
> + struct ptp_sys_offset *sysoff;
> +
> +
> char *progname;
> - int c, cnt, fd;
> + int i, c, cnt, fd;
>
> char *device = DEVICE;
> clockid_t clkid;
> @@ -144,6 +149,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> int extts = 0;
> int gettime = 0;
> int oneshot = 0;
> + int offset = 0;
> + int n_samples = 0;
> int periodic = 0;
> int perout = -1;
> int pps = -1;
> @@ -151,7 +158,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> progname = strrchr(argv[0], '/');
> progname = progname ? 1+progname : argv[0];
> - while (EOF != (c = getopt(argc, argv, "a:A:cd:e:f:ghp:P:sSt:v"))) {
> + while (EOF != (c = getopt(argc, argv, "a:A:cd:e:f:ghk:p:P:sSt:v"))) {
> switch (c) {
> case 'a':
> oneshot = atoi(optarg);
> @@ -174,6 +181,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> case 'g':
> gettime = 1;
> break;
> + case 'k':
> + offset = 1;
> + n_samples = atoi(optarg);
> + break;
> case 'p':
> perout = atoi(optarg);
> break;
> @@ -376,6 +387,31 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> }
> }
>
> + if (offset) {
> + sysoff = calloc(1, sizeof(*sysoff));
> + if (!sysoff) {
> + perror("calloc");
> + return -1;
> + }
> + sysoff->n_samples = n_samples;
> +
> + if (ioctl(fd, PTP_SYS_OFFSET, sysoff))
> + perror("PTP_SYS_OFFSET");
> + else
> + puts("time offset between PHC and
> + system clock request okay");
> +
> + pct = &sysoff->ts[0];
> + for (i = 0; i < sysoff->n_samples; i++, pct++) {
> + printf("system time: %ld.%ld\n", pct->sec, pct->nsec);
> + pct++;
> + printf("phc time: %ld.%ld\n\n", pct->sec, pct->nsec);
^^^^
I think the output would look nicer with only one newline. After all,
each measurement is a {sys,phc,sys} triplet and not a {sys,phc} pair.
> + }
> + printf("system time: %ld.%ld\n", pct->sec, pct->nsec);
> +
> + free(sysoff);
> + }
> +
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
