* Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > So my NAK stands: you are still in denial, you should stop the silly
> > arguing and you should stop wasting maintainer time. You need to
> > address PeterZ's review feedback and fix the bugs in your patches,
> > ASAP.
>
> You are NAKing my patches that add the preempt checks? Now I am
> confused. I thought you wanted those?
My NAK of the original patches stands until the debug checks are working
and are put up for a merge. You were talking nonsense all around in this
thread and I simply don't trust your promise, but I'll obviously trust a
queued up fix.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
