On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 10:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:46:35PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:30:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c > > > index fa6964d..486c0ba 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c > > > +++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c > > > @@ -359,6 +359,14 @@ static int intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev, > > > if (!(lapic_timer_reliable_states & (1 << (cstate)))) > > > clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER, &cpu); > > > > > > + current_thread_into()->status |= TS_POLLING; > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * Order against setting of TS_POLLING against the reading of > > > + * NEED_RESCHED, matched by resched_task(). > > > + */ > > > + smp_mb(); > > > + > > > if (!need_resched()) { > > > > > > __monitor((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0); > > > @@ -367,6 +375,8 @@ static int intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev, > > > __mwait(eax, ecx); > > > } > > > > > > + current_thread_into()->status &= ~TS_POLLING; > > > + > > > if (!(lapic_timer_reliable_states & (1 << (cstate)))) > > > clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT, &cpu); > > > > Hmm, arguably it would be better to set this from > > intel_idle_cpuidle_driver_init() and clear it whenever this goes away. > > Not sure how all that works, the cpuidle driver framework seems 'weird'. > > OK, so I went over the idle stuff again, and we do set TS_POLLING like > stuff, it got hidden in current_{clr,set}_polling(). > > Still if that patch causes extra IPIs its bound to be broken in some > creative way.. I'll prod.
(thanks, when I get a break from testing/poking this'n'that, I'll take a peek too... well, good_intentions++ anyway;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/