On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 04:02:28PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > On 08/22/2013 06:35 AM, Anton Arapov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Thank you for contacting me. I will cross-post this to LKML, as there > > is an information that might be interested for other folks. > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:31:21PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote: > >> We, the Gentoo Kernel Project Team at Gentoo Linux, might be interested > >> to contribute oopses to oops.kernel.org; but from a first look over what > >> can be found on the ML and the internet about that site, there seems to > >> be no information available about submitting to oops.kernel.org. > > This kind of information will be there soon. > > > > > >> So, could you please highlight the details on how submission happens? > >> Does this (have to) happen automatically? Can we do manual submissions? > > oops.kernel.org uses the old legacy kerneloops.org's api for data > > collecting. Both, http://submit.kerneloops.org/submitoops.php (old) and > > http://oops.kernel.org/submitoops.php (new, stick to this one) works today. > > The Ubuntu distro is still configured to submit oops to > http://submit.kerneloops.org/submitoops.php using the kerneloops package > developed by Arjan. However, it has been disabled since the original > kerneloops.org site went down. We can re-enable oops submissions. Will > the old submit URL still work, or are you migrating to the new > http://oops.kernel.org/submitoops.php URL?
Old URL still works, so you can use the kerneloops package as is and it should work. I will update the package itself later, with new url and few improvements for oopses detection. Anton. > > > > > Reporting doesn't happen automatically. Two tools available for > > sending reports: abrt/libreport (1) and former kerneloops daemon (2). > > Either of these can send reports automatically or manually. > > > > > > (1) https://fedorahosted.org/abrt/ - iirc, is already packaged in gentoo. > > (2) There are no link to kerneloops, this is what I was able to google: > > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops_0.12+git20090217.orig.tar.gz > > Abrt has a better scanner/reporter, which produce less false-positive > > reports. > > > > > > I don't know what way Gentoo will choose, but the original kerneloops > > daemon requires some love to make it run under systemd and improve the > > oops scanner (can be ported from abrt). > > > > > > The source of _scanner_ abrt/dumpoops_plugin: > > https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/abrt.git/tree/src/plugins/abrt-dump-oops.c > > The source of _reporter_ abrt/libreport/kerneloops_plugin: > > https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/libreport.git/tree/src/plugins/reporter-kerneloops.c > > > > libreport allows to report manually using CLI: > > $ reporter-kerneloops > > Usage: reporter-kerneloops [-v] [-c CONFFILE]... -d DIR > > > > > >> I think that something that "calls home" might become a concern; maybe > >> we could still provide that as opt-in, but manual submits would be neat. > > Few years of experience with Abrt/Bugzilla reports, people fill the > > additional information in less than 2% of all reports. And, the Abrt > > team is working towards the least possible interaction with the user. > > This is mostly to address privacy concerns, as well as leaving the > > possibility to provide additional data. > > > > > >> Thank you in advance for your explanation. > > You are welcome, let me know if you'll need any help further. > > > > Anton. > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
