On 09/06/2013 08:09 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu> wrote: >> Hi Linus, >> >> please pull these Microblaze patches to your tree. > > Hmm. You've started using signed tags, nice. I just wonder why you use > use one that seems to be a relatively weak 1024-bit key (ID: 294A0C21) > when you have stronger ones available? > > Not a huge deal, I'm just wondering.
I am using signed tags for Xilinx Zynq (arm-soc tree) for several months because Olof asked for it. But this was the first time I used it for Microblaze. The problem is that I can't see 2048-bit key in my secretkeys but it is in my public key. Probably I removed it when I was playing with it. I don't know if I can import this public subkey back to my secret key or just revoke it. This is the reason why you can see stronger key but git can't use it. BTW: In that time I setup my PC that I can even send signed patches with git send-email. Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
