From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>

rtc-tps6586x calls enable/disable_irq_wake() during suspend/resume. Since
the main tps6586x irq_chip doesn't implement .irq_set_wake, this causes
the RTC's enable_irq_wake() to fail, and the disable_irq_wake() to spew a
WARN about unbalanced wake disable. Solve this by implementing
.irq_set_wake.

Also, I assume that enable_irq_wake() shouldn't be called unconditionally
in tps6586x_irq_init(), since this is now triggered by IRQ children
setting up their cascaded IRQs for wake. So, remove that.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
---
I'm tempted to Cc stable here, since this bug is certainly present in
older kernel releases. However, the only user-visible aspect is the WARN
on resume, so I'm not sure if it's worth it?
---
 drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c b/drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c
index f54fe4d..68906b1 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c
@@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ struct tps6586x {
        struct i2c_client       *client;
        struct regmap           *regmap;
 
+       int                     irq;
        struct irq_chip         irq_chip;
        struct mutex            irq_lock;
        int                     irq_base;
@@ -261,12 +262,23 @@ static void tps6586x_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data 
*data)
        mutex_unlock(&tps6586x->irq_lock);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int tps6586x_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *irq_data, unsigned int on)
+{
+       struct tps6586x *tps6586x = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irq_data);
+       return irq_set_irq_wake(tps6586x->irq, on);
+}
+#else
+#define tps6586x_irq_set_wake NULL
+#endif
+
 static struct irq_chip tps6586x_irq_chip = {
        .name = "tps6586x",
        .irq_bus_lock = tps6586x_irq_lock,
        .irq_bus_sync_unlock = tps6586x_irq_sync_unlock,
        .irq_disable = tps6586x_irq_disable,
        .irq_enable = tps6586x_irq_enable,
+       .irq_set_wake = tps6586x_irq_set_wake,
 };
 
 static int tps6586x_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
@@ -331,6 +343,8 @@ static int tps6586x_irq_init(struct tps6586x *tps6586x, int 
irq,
        int new_irq_base;
        int irq_num = ARRAY_SIZE(tps6586x_irqs);
 
+       tps6586x->irq = irq;
+
        mutex_init(&tps6586x->irq_lock);
        for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
                tps6586x->mask_reg[i] = 0xff;
@@ -360,10 +374,8 @@ static int tps6586x_irq_init(struct tps6586x *tps6586x, 
int irq,
        ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, tps6586x_irq, IRQF_ONESHOT,
                                   "tps6586x", tps6586x);
 
-       if (!ret) {
+       if (!ret)
                device_init_wakeup(tps6586x->dev, 1);
-               enable_irq_wake(irq);
-       }
 
        return ret;
 }
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to