>>> On 03.09.13 at 20:30, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <k...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> @@ -76,6 +80,26 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
>       printk(KERN_INFO "HyperV: features 0x%x, hints 0x%x\n",
>              ms_hyperv.features, ms_hyperv.hints);
>  
> +     if (ms_hyperv.features & HV_X64_MSR_APIC_FREQUENCY_AVAILABLE) {
> +             /*
> +              * Get the APIC frequency.
> +              */
> +             rdmsrl(HV_X64_MSR_APIC_FREQUENCY, hv_lapic_frequency);
> +             hv_lapic_frequency /= HZ;
> +             lapic_timer_frequency = hv_lapic_frequency;
> +             printk(KERN_INFO "HyperV: LAPIC Timer Frequency: %#x\n",
> +                             lapic_timer_frequency);
> +
> +             /*
> +              * On Hyper-V, when we are booting off an EFI firmware stack,
> +              * we do not have many legacy devices including PIC, PIT etc.
> +              */
> +             if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT)) {
> +                     printk(KERN_INFO "HyperV: Using null_legacy_pic\n");
> +                     legacy_pic = &null_legacy_pic;
> +             }

And this check is really connected to the feature check around the
whole block, rather than being independent? (I'd also think that
this latter message would suffice to be KERN_DEBUG).

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to