On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 10:59 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Ian Kent <ra...@themaw.net> wrote: > > >> The check in waitq.c above "is" used to validate the need to callback to > >> the daemon to request a mount. > > Okay. But then shouldn't the check be "if (d_mountpoint(dentry)) valid = > 0;" ?
I don't think so. But again, may_umount() might do what's needed here too. I don't think this is enough because it doesn't cover the case where the dentry is not simple_empty() but has no mounts below. That's not a normal use case but could happen if the daemon crashed at just the wrong time, encountered an error condition that didn't allow it to cleanup directories, or a user umounted triggers within the tree before starting the daemon. > > Thanks, > Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
