Re: spindown [was Re: 2.4.6-pre2, pre3 VM Behavior]

[Rik van Riel]

On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:


Oops, I did something stupid and the patch is reversed ;)


> --- buffer.c.orig     Sat Jun 16 18:05:15 2001
> +++ buffer.c  Sat Jun 16 18:05:29 2001
> @@ -2550,8 +2550,7 @@
>                          if the current bh is not yet timed out,
>                          then also all the following bhs
>                          will be too young. */
> -                     if (++flushed > bdf_prm.b_un.ndirty &&
> -                                     time_before(jiffies, bh->b_flushtime))
> +                     if(time_before(jiffies, bh->b_flushtime))
>                               goto out_unlock;
>               } else {
>                       if (++flushed > bdf_prm.b_un.ndirty)


Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

http://www.surriel.com/         http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (spam digging piggy)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/