On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:14:19PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > I intended to say nr_node_ids, the same size as buffers such as the > > task_numa_buffers. If we ever return a nid > nr_node_ids here then > > task_numa_fault would corrupt memory. However, it should be possible for > > node_weight to exceed nr_node_ids except maybe during node hot-remove so > > it's not the problem. > > The nodemask situation seems somewhat more confused than the cpumask > case; how would we ever return a nid > nr_node_ids? Corrupt nodemask? >
ARGH. I meant impossible. The exact bloody opposite of what I wrote. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
