On 08/29/13 13:08, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:28:02PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
@@ -100,19 +101,17 @@ static enum imx23_clk clks_init_on[] __initdata = {
        cpu, hbus, xbus, emi, uart,
  };

-int __init mx23_clocks_init(void)
+static void __init mx23_clocks_init(struct device_node *np)
  {
-       struct device_node *np;
        u32 i;

+       clkctrl = of_iomap(np, 0);
+       WARN_ON(!clkctrl);
+
        np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx23-digctl");
        digctrl = of_iomap(np, 0);
        WARN_ON(!digctrl);

-       np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx23-clkctrl");
-       clkctrl = of_iomap(np, 0);
-       WARN_ON(!clkctrl);
-

With the changes, 'np' becomes a pointer to digctl node instead of
clkctrl as the original.  This will cause problem for
of_clk_add_provider(np, ...) later in this function.

Same problem with mx28_clocks_init() changes.

Ok, will take care of it. I assume you are fine with having an extra
struct device_node pointer for the sake of readability instead of
reusing the same pointer.

Sebastian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to