Hi Eric,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:26:56PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> I have take a moment and read this thread, and have been completely
> unenlightend. People are upset but it is totally unclear why.
>
> There is no explanation why it is ok to ignore the suid-exec case, as
> the posted patches do. Which ultimately means the patches provide
Please, did you take a look at the patches ?
- INF("syscall", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_syscall),
+ INF("syscall", S_IRUSR, proc_pid_syscall),
Can you please tell me how did you come to the conclusion that the
patches "ignore the suid-exec case as the posted patches do" ?
I just did s/0444/0400/ which is pretty obvious and did not remove
that ptrace check at read() added by Al.
> little to no security benefit, and that the posted patches as written
> are broken.
They are correct. Perhaps you didn't take a closer look
Thanks Eric
--
Djalal Harouni
http://opendz.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
