On 08/28/2013 01:52 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:45:45 AM Zoran Markovic wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >>> It doesn't look too bad from a quick look, but there's a couple of things >>> I don't like in it still (relatively minor). >> If there are things you would like changed in this patch, please let >> me know. It would be nice to catch the 3.12 merge window. > Well, it's not in my queue to be honest. > > Is there any practical reason why it should go into the next release?
I wouldn't say its critical for the next release, but I feel like this was the same response last cycle. Zoran's since investigated the various alternative approaches you've suggested, and continues to be interested in resolving your remaining objections. Its a useful feature the Android devs use, which could also help non-android developers debug suspend issues on their systems. If you really just feel its something best left out of tree, that's hard to argue against. Its just a debug tool and the android guys don't have an issue carrying their own tree, after all. But the cost of leaving it out is just the potential of others having to re-implement similar hacks on their own instead of collaborating on shared infrastructure. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
