On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 06:47:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Subject: sched, numa: Use {cpu, pid} to create task groups for shared faults
> From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> Date: Tue Jul 30 10:40:20 CEST 2013
> 
> A very simple/straight forward shared fault task grouping
> implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>

So Rik and me found a possible issue with this -- although in the end it
turned out to be a userspace 'feature' instead.

It might be possible for a COW page to be 'shared' and thus get a
last_cpupid set from another process. When we break cow and reuse the
now private and writable page might still have this last_cpupid and thus
cause a shared fault and form grouping.

Something like the below resets the last_cpupid field on reuse much like
fresh COW copies will have.

There might be something that avoids the above scenario but I'm too
tired to come up with anything.

---

--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2730,6 +2730,9 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct mm_struct *
                get_page(dirty_page);
 
 reuse:
+               if (old_page)
+                       page_cpupid_xchg_last(old_page, (1 << 
LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT) - 1);
+
                flush_cache_page(vma, address, pte_pfn(orig_pte));
                entry = pte_mkyoung(orig_pte);
                entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to