* Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> Various optimizations related to CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY and x86
> uaccess
Looks mostly good.
Does this patchset change the number of cond_resched() preemption points
on CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y, or is it a scheduling invariant?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
