On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:44:50AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > +Felipe > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexander Savchenko > <oleksandr.savche...@ti.com> wrote: > > From: Ruchika Kharwar <ruch...@ti.com> > > > > Ensure the Interrupt handling routine return IRQ_HANDLED vs > > IRQ_NONE. > > Why? > > By unconditionally returning IRQ_HANDLED, this patch will surely break > systems where the UART IRQ is shared with other platforms. > > I just noticed this patch when bisecting a related problem. Why > wasn't this Cc'd to linux-omap where OMAP users might have been more > likely to see it? > > Greg, without a better justification in the changelog, I think this > patch should be dropped from tty-next.
Now reverted, sorry for the delay. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
