3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>

commit 2816c551c796ec14620325b2c9ed75b9979d3125 upstream.

Change trace_remove_event_call(call) to return the error if this
call is active. This is what the callers assume but can't verify
outside of the tracing locks. Both trace_kprobe.c/trace_uprobe.c
need the additional changes, unregister_trace_probe() should abort
if trace_remove_event_call() fails.

The caller is going to free this call/file so we must ensure that
nobody can use them after trace_remove_event_call() succeeds.
debugfs should be fine after the previous changes and event_remove()
does TRACE_REG_UNREGISTER, but still there are 2 reasons why we need
the additional checks:

- There could be a perf_event(s) attached to this tp_event, so the
  patch checks ->perf_refcount.

- TRACE_REG_UNREGISTER can be suppressed by FTRACE_EVENT_FL_SOFT_MODE,
  so we simply check FTRACE_EVENT_FL_ENABLED protected by event_mutex.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130729175033.gb26...@redhat.com

Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 include/linux/ftrace_event.h |    2 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_events.c  |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ extern int trace_define_field(struct ftr
                              const char *name, int offset, int size,
                              int is_signed, int filter_type);
 extern int trace_add_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call);
-extern void trace_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call);
+extern int trace_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call);
 
 #define is_signed_type(type)   (((type)(-1)) < (type)1)
 
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -1735,16 +1735,47 @@ static void __trace_remove_event_call(st
        destroy_preds(call);
 }
 
+static int probe_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call)
+{
+       struct trace_array *tr;
+       struct ftrace_event_file *file;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
+       if (call->perf_refcount)
+               return -EBUSY;
+#endif
+       do_for_each_event_file(tr, file) {
+               if (file->event_call != call)
+                       continue;
+               /*
+                * We can't rely on ftrace_event_enable_disable(enable => 0)
+                * we are going to do, FTRACE_EVENT_FL_SOFT_MODE can suppress
+                * TRACE_REG_UNREGISTER.
+                */
+               if (file->flags & FTRACE_EVENT_FL_ENABLED)
+                       return -EBUSY;
+               break;
+       } while_for_each_event_file();
+
+       __trace_remove_event_call(call);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
 /* Remove an event_call */
-void trace_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call)
+int trace_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call)
 {
+       int ret;
+
        mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
        mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
        down_write(&trace_event_sem);
-       __trace_remove_event_call(call);
+       ret = probe_remove_event_call(call);
        up_write(&trace_event_sem);
        mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
        mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
+
+       return ret;
 }
 
 #define for_each_event(event, start, end)                      \


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to