On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM -0700, Paul Turner wrote: > > @@ -5157,6 +5158,13 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s > > tmp->parent = parent->parent; > > if (parent->parent) > > parent->parent->child = tmp; > > + /* > > + * Transfer SD_PREFER_SIBLING down in case of a > > + * degenerate parent; the spans match for this > > + * so the property transfers. > > + */ > > + if (parent->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING) > > + tmp->flags |= SD_PREFER_SIBLING; > > destroy_sched_domain(parent, cpu); > > } else > > tmp = tmp->parent; > > > > Reviewed-by: Paul Turner <p...@google.com>
BTW, did that comment make sense to you or would you suggest something different? I had/am having a hard time with that comment. Somehow it leaves me wanting. I know I understand the issue now, but I'll doubt the comment will suffice in a years time :/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
