Hi Sebastian, Steffen,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:30:18AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 08/23/13 02:59, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:26:47PM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:04:31AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >>>With arch/arm calling of_clk_init(NULL) from time_init(), we can now
> >>>remove it from corresponding drivers/clk code.
> >>
> >>I think that would break Zynq.
> >>If I see this correctly you call of_clk_init() from common code,
> >>_before_ the SOC specific time init function is called.
> >>The problem is, that we have code setting up a global pointer which is
> >>required by zynq_clk_setup() which is triggered when of_clk_init() is
> >>called.
[ ... ]
> thanks for looking into this. I also had a look at the files in
> question. Based on Steffen's proposal, I prepared a diff that should do
> the trick. It moves zynq_slcr_init() to early_init, instead of reusing
> another hook that has magic cow powers (it calls irqchip_init that zynq
> also wants sooner or later).
>
> Also, it removes zynq_clock_init() and let zynq_clk_setup() map the
> register itself by finding the node and use of_iomap(). I realized that
> clock registers are quite separated within slcr, so you can consider
> to have your own node for the clk-provider. As Steffen is proposing
> this but mentioned incompatible DT changes, I chose that intermediate
> step above.
>
> It would be great, if you test the diff and prepare a patch out of
> it, that I pick-up in the patch set. That way, we also have your
> Signed-off on it.
I looked into this. Looks like init_early() happens to early. I suspect
slab is missing to make zynq_slcr_init() work. So, I moved it into
init_irq(). Is there any init_call() type which is called at the correct
time?
I looked briefly into syscon and regmap, and that does actually look
promising and to really fix this mess, I guess we have to wait a little
until Steffen finishes his work on it.
To facilitate Sebastian's series I came up with the patch below.
The problem I have is, I do not really want the clkc to map the
registers. They are in the SLCR and the SLCR driver is doing it, hence
we should work with what that driver provides - which ideally would be
based on regmap and syscon, but we're not there yet. Hence I somehow
need to pass the SLCR pointer to the clkc. To avoid accessing the global
pointer directly I kept the zynq_clock_init() routine which is called
from zynq_slcr_init().
That is the best I could come up with quickly and w/o investing a lot of
time to figure out the regmap and syscon stuff, which seems to be handled
by Steffen already, anyway.
It is essentially a stripped down version of Sebastian's proposal.
Sören
-----8<--------------------8<-------------------8<-------------------
>From bb7a02dad9cc578caf1e21a1b7f45ed602676bfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkm...@xilinx.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:27:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH RFC] arm: zynq: Don't call of_clk_init()
of_clk_init() has been moved to be called from common code, therefore
remove it from Zynq's clock init routine.
Since the Zynq's clock setup routine relies on an initialized SLCR,
zynq_slcr_init() is moved to init_irq() (note: it must be before
init_time() but after slab is available, hence init_early() does not
work).
Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkm...@xilinx.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c | 9 ++++-----
drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
index 5f25256..f28046e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
@@ -19,10 +19,9 @@
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/clk.h>
-#include <linux/clk/zynq.h>
-#include <linux/clocksource.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
@@ -58,10 +57,10 @@ static void __init zynq_init_machine(void)
of_platform_bus_probe(NULL, zynq_of_bus_ids, NULL);
}
-static void __init zynq_timer_init(void)
+static void __init zynq_init_irq(void)
{
+ irqchip_init();
zynq_slcr_init();
- clocksource_of_init();
}
static struct map_desc zynq_cortex_a9_scu_map __initdata = {
@@ -104,8 +103,8 @@ static const char * const zynq_dt_match[] = {
DT_MACHINE_START(XILINX_EP107, "Xilinx Zynq Platform")
.smp = smp_ops(zynq_smp_ops),
.map_io = zynq_map_io,
+ .init_irq = zynq_init_irq,
.init_machine = zynq_init_machine,
- .init_time = zynq_timer_init,
.dt_compat = zynq_dt_match,
.restart = zynq_system_reset,
MACHINE_END
diff --git a/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c b/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
index 089d3e3..53b851e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
@@ -206,6 +206,9 @@ static void __init zynq_clk_setup(struct device_node *np)
pr_info("Zynq clock init\n");
+ if (WARN_ON(!zynq_slcr_base_priv))
+ return;
+
/* get clock output names from DT */
for (i = 0; i < clk_max; i++) {
if (of_property_read_string_index(np, "clock-output-names",
@@ -532,5 +535,4 @@ CLK_OF_DECLARE(zynq_clkc, "xlnx,ps7-clkc", zynq_clk_setup);
void __init zynq_clock_init(void __iomem *slcr_base)
{
zynq_slcr_base_priv = slcr_base;
- of_clk_init(NULL);
}
--
1.8.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
