Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com> writes:

> vma_has_reserves() can be substituted by using return value of
> vma_needs_reservation(). If chg returned by vma_needs_reservation()
> is 0, it means that vma has reserves. Otherwise, it means that vma don't
> have reserves and need a hugepage outside of reserve pool. This definition
> is perfectly same as vma_has_reserves(), so remove vma_has_reserves().
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>

Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index e6c0c77..22ceb04 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -473,39 +473,6 @@ void reset_vma_resv_huge_pages(struct vm_area_struct 
> *vma)
>               vma->vm_private_data = (void *)0;
>  }
>
> -/* Returns true if the VMA has associated reserve pages */
> -static int vma_has_reserves(struct vm_area_struct *vma, long chg)
> -{
> -     if (vma->vm_flags & VM_NORESERVE) {
> -             /*
> -              * This address is already reserved by other process(chg == 0),
> -              * so, we should decreament reserved count. Without
> -              * decreamenting, reserve count is remained after releasing
> -              * inode, because this allocated page will go into page cache
> -              * and is regarded as coming from reserved pool in releasing
> -              * step. Currently, we don't have any other solution to deal
> -              * with this situation properly, so add work-around here.
> -              */
> -             if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE && chg == 0)
> -                     return 1;
> -             else
> -                     return 0;
> -     }
> -
> -     /* Shared mappings always use reserves */
> -     if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)
> -             return 1;
> -
> -     /*
> -      * Only the process that called mmap() has reserves for
> -      * private mappings.
> -      */
> -     if (is_vma_resv_set(vma, HPAGE_RESV_OWNER))
> -             return 1;
> -
> -     return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static void copy_gigantic_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src)
>  {
>       int i;
> @@ -580,8 +547,7 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_vma(struct hstate 
> *h,
>        * have no page reserves. This check ensures that reservations are
>        * not "stolen". The child may still get SIGKILLed
>        */
> -     if (!vma_has_reserves(vma, chg) &&
> -                     h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages == 0)
> +     if (chg && h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages == 0)
>               return NULL;
>
>       /* If reserves cannot be used, ensure enough pages are in the pool */
> @@ -600,7 +566,7 @@ retry_cpuset:
>                       if (page) {
>                               if (avoid_reserve)
>                                       break;
> -                             if (!vma_has_reserves(vma, chg))
> +                             if (chg)
>                                       break;
>
>                               SetPagePrivate(page);

Can you add a comment above both the place to explain why checking chg
is good enough ?

-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to