Add the seqlock version of raw_seqcount_begin() for readers
that can't wait for writers to complete their update and
who can live with seqlock read acquirement failure.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: John Stultz <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Don Zickus <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/seqlock.h |    5 +++++
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index 1829905..aa845de 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -203,6 +203,11 @@ static inline unsigned read_seqbegin(const seqlock_t *sl)
        return read_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
 }
 
+static inline unsigned raw_seqbegin(const seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+       return raw_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
 static inline unsigned read_seqretry(const seqlock_t *sl, unsigned start)
 {
        return read_seqcount_retry(&sl->seqcount, start);
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to