On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:04:00PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 15:40 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Given that I had to just revert a patch in the recent stable releases > > that didn't get enough time to "bake" in Linus's tree (or in -next), I > > figured it was worth discussing some possible changes with how "fast" I > > pick up patches for stable releases. > > > > So, how about this proposal: > > > > - I will wait for a -rc to come out with the patch in it before putting > > it into a stable release, unless: > > - the maintainer ACKs it, or sends it directly (like DaveM does > > for networking patches) > > - I have seen enough discussion about a patch to show that it > > really does fix something / is good / doesn't cause problems. > > - obviously safe, i.e. "add a device id" type thing. > > > > Given that we have -rc releases every week, except for the initial -rc1 > > release, I don't think this will really cause any major delays. > > > > Also, now that we are about to head into my busy "travel season", odds > > are, I'll be at least a week behind anyway, so this would probably start > > happening without an "official" change. It's been a boring summer, I've > > been able to keep up with the stable stuff really easily, causing > > problems like this :) > > > > Objections? Comments? > > Sounds like a reasonable tradeoff, as long as the 'please include this > to stable ASAP' latency for critical fixes does not end up being too > large..
Given the current number of those that I get are relativly small, it shouldn't be that big of a deal. All this really means is that I get a week vacation now, and then I'll pick back up with stable releases :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
