Miles Lane <miles.l...@gmail.com> writes: > [ 24.990076] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] > [ 24.990086] 3.11.0-rc6+ #154 Not tainted > [ 24.990094] ------------------------------------------------------- > [ 24.990103] crda/1159 is trying to acquire lock: > [ 24.990111] (genl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff812ff7e6>] > genl_lock+0x12/0x14 > [ 24.990134] > [ 24.990134] but task is already holding lock: > [ 24.990144] (nlk->cb_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff812fdab8>] > netlink_dump+0x1c/0x1da
Yes, me too... This is already discussed on netdev: http://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg18179.html But the fix is still out in the blue as far as I understand. Reverting 58ad436fc will fix it, but leave the original problem (missing locking) unfixed. Bjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/