On 9 Jun 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > The big kernel lock rules are that it's a "normal spinlock" in many > regards, BUT you can block while holding it, and the BKL will magically > be released during the blocking. This means, for example, that the BKL > can never deadlock with a semaphore - if a BKL holder blocks on sombody > elses semaphore (and that somebody else wants the BKL), then the act of > blocking on the semaphore will release the BKL, and allow the original > semaphore holder to continue. Another difference from spinlocks is that BKL is recursive. I'm actually surprised that it didn't show up first. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlocks in 2.4.5-ac8 Dawson Engler
- checker suggestion Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: checker suggestion Dawson Engler
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlocks in 2.4.5... Alexander Viro
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlocks in 2.4.5... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlocks in 2... Alexander Viro
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlocks ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlo... David Woodhouse
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential d... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential d... Rusty Russell
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potenti... David Woodhouse
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlo... Alexander Viro
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential d... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potenti... Alexander Viro
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlo... Dawson Engler
- Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential d... Linus Torvalds