On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote: > Why are half the people here trying to hide behind this diskspace > is cheap argument? If we rely on that, then Linux sucks shit. Never mind them, I haven't seen any of them contribute VM code, even ;) OTOH, disk space _is_ cheap, so the other VM - performance related - VM bugs do have a somewhat higher priority at the moment. regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (spam digging piggy) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Remi Turk
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Kai Henningsen
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps android
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Mike A. Harris
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Rik van Riel
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps dean gaudet
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Kurt Roeckx
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Dr S.M. Huen
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Mark Salisbury
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Mike A. Harris
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Rik van Riel
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Mike A. Harris
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Shane Nay
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Shane Nay
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Marcelo Tosatti
- VM Report was:Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Shane Nay
- Re: VM Report was:Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Jonathan Morton
- Re: VM Report was:Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Mike Galbraith
- Re: VM Report was:Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Tobias Ringstrom
- Re: VM Report was:Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps John Stoffel