* Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-current tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c between commit b88a2595b6d8 ("perf/arm: Fix
> armpmu_map_hw_event()") from Linus' tree and commit d9f966357b14 ("ARM:
> 7810/1: perf: Fix array out of bounds access in armpmu_map_hw_event()")
> from the arm-current tree.
>
> These are the same patch except for the return code (and the much more
> comprehensive commit message in the arm-current tree version). I fixed
> it up (using the arm-current tree version - return -EINVAL instead of
> -ENOENT - I have no way to guess which is right) and can carry the fix
> as necessary (no action is required).
-EINVAL would be the better/cleaner one, so when this gets merged upstream
we should pick up Russell's version. It does not affect functionality.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
