3.6.11.7-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jerome Glisse <jgli...@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 8444d5c69549aa0f0b574cc608742d4669e1cc01 ]

There might be issue with lockup detection when scheduling on an
empty ring that have been sitting idle for a while. Thus update
the lockup tracking data when scheduling new work in an empty ring.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jgli...@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c |    7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
index f2017fc..69ffa29 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
@@ -366,6 +366,13 @@ int radeon_ring_alloc(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct 
radeon_ring *ring, unsi
                return -ENOMEM;
        /* Align requested size with padding so unlock_commit can
         * pad safely */
+       radeon_ring_free_size(rdev, ring);
+       if (ring->ring_free_dw == (ring->ring_size / 4)) {
+               /* This is an empty ring update lockup info to avoid
+                * false positive.
+                */
+               radeon_ring_lockup_update(ring);
+       }
        ndw = (ndw + ring->align_mask) & ~ring->align_mask;
        while (ndw > (ring->ring_free_dw - 1)) {
                radeon_ring_free_size(rdev, ring);
-- 
1.7.10.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to