On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 05:19:13PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> device_close()->recalc_sigpending() is not needed, sigprocmask()
> takes care of TIF_SIGPENDING correctly.
> 
> And without ->siglock it is racy and wrong, it can wrongly clear
> TIF_SIGPENDING and miss a signal.
> 
> But even with this patch device_close() is still buggy:
> 
>       1. sigprocmask() should not be used, we have set_task_blocked(),
>          but this is minor.
> 
>       2. We should never block SIGKILL or SIGSTOP, and this is what
>          the code tries to do.
> 
>       3. This can't protect against SIGKILL or SIGSTOP anyway. Another
>          thread can do signal_wake_up(), say, do_signal_stop() or
>          complete_signal() or debugger.
> 
>       4. sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, allsigs) doesn't necessarily clears
>          TIF_SIGPENDING, say, freezing() or ->jobctl.
> 
>       5. device_write() looks equally wrong by the same reason.
> 
> Looks like, this tries to protect some wait_event_interruptible() logic
> from signals, it should be turned into uninterruptible wait. Or we need
> to implement something like signals_stop/start for such a use-case.

I can't remember why that signal code exists, or if I ever knew; it was
there when the code was added seven years ago.  I agree that if there's
something we cannot interrupt, we should use uninterruptible, but I don't
see any cases of that either.  I think we should just remove it all
(untested):

From: David Teigland <teigl...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:22:43 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] dlm: remove signal blocking

The signal blocking was incorrect and unnecessary
so just remove it.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigl...@redhat.com>
---
 fs/dlm/user.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/user.c b/fs/dlm/user.c
index 911649a..142e216 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/user.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/user.c
@@ -493,7 +493,6 @@ static ssize_t device_write(struct file *file, const char 
__user *buf,
 {
        struct dlm_user_proc *proc = file->private_data;
        struct dlm_write_request *kbuf;
-       sigset_t tmpsig, allsigs;
        int error;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
@@ -557,9 +556,6 @@ static ssize_t device_write(struct file *file, const char 
__user *buf,
                goto out_free;
        }
 
-       sigfillset(&allsigs);
-       sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &allsigs, &tmpsig);
-
        error = -EINVAL;
 
        switch (kbuf->cmd)
@@ -567,7 +563,7 @@ static ssize_t device_write(struct file *file, const char 
__user *buf,
        case DLM_USER_LOCK:
                if (!proc) {
                        log_print("no locking on control device");
-                       goto out_sig;
+                       goto out_free;
                }
                error = device_user_lock(proc, &kbuf->i.lock);
                break;
@@ -575,7 +571,7 @@ static ssize_t device_write(struct file *file, const char 
__user *buf,
        case DLM_USER_UNLOCK:
                if (!proc) {
                        log_print("no locking on control device");
-                       goto out_sig;
+                       goto out_free;
                }
                error = device_user_unlock(proc, &kbuf->i.lock);
                break;
@@ -583,7 +579,7 @@ static ssize_t device_write(struct file *file, const char 
__user *buf,
        case DLM_USER_DEADLOCK:
                if (!proc) {
                        log_print("no locking on control device");
-                       goto out_sig;
+                       goto out_free;
                }
                error = device_user_deadlock(proc, &kbuf->i.lock);
                break;
@@ -591,7 +587,7 @@ static ssize_t device_write(struct file *file, const char 
__user *buf,
        case DLM_USER_CREATE_LOCKSPACE:
                if (proc) {
                        log_print("create/remove only on control device");
-                       goto out_sig;
+                       goto out_free;
                }
                error = device_create_lockspace(&kbuf->i.lspace);
                break;
@@ -599,7 +595,7 @@ static ssize_t device_write(struct file *file, const char 
__user *buf,
        case DLM_USER_REMOVE_LOCKSPACE:
                if (proc) {
                        log_print("create/remove only on control device");
-                       goto out_sig;
+                       goto out_free;
                }
                error = device_remove_lockspace(&kbuf->i.lspace);
                break;
@@ -607,7 +603,7 @@ static ssize_t device_write(struct file *file, const char 
__user *buf,
        case DLM_USER_PURGE:
                if (!proc) {
                        log_print("no locking on control device");
-                       goto out_sig;
+                       goto out_free;
                }
                error = device_user_purge(proc, &kbuf->i.purge);
                break;
@@ -617,8 +613,6 @@ static ssize_t device_write(struct file *file, const char 
__user *buf,
                          kbuf->cmd);
        }
 
- out_sig:
-       sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &tmpsig, NULL);
  out_free:
        kfree(kbuf);
        return error;
@@ -659,15 +653,11 @@ static int device_close(struct inode *inode, struct file 
*file)
 {
        struct dlm_user_proc *proc = file->private_data;
        struct dlm_ls *ls;
-       sigset_t tmpsig, allsigs;
 
        ls = dlm_find_lockspace_local(proc->lockspace);
        if (!ls)
                return -ENOENT;
 
-       sigfillset(&allsigs);
-       sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &allsigs, &tmpsig);
-
        set_bit(DLM_PROC_FLAGS_CLOSING, &proc->flags);
 
        dlm_clear_proc_locks(ls, proc);
@@ -685,9 +675,6 @@ static int device_close(struct inode *inode, struct file 
*file)
        /* FIXME: AUTOFREE: if this ls is no longer used do
           device_remove_lockspace() */
 
-       sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &tmpsig, NULL);
-       recalc_sigpending();
-
        return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to