On 12 August 2013 13:05, Shawn Guo <shawn....@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 07:18:10PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling >> cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). >> >> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn....@linaro.org> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> > > I'm not copied on the patch that introduces function > cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(). So if it does the right/equivalent > thing, for cpufreq-cpu0 and imx6q-cpufreq:
You better check it :) https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/8/266 I wasn't probably following the right way for sending mails as I was expecting people to look at these patches over list.. In the next series with 44 patch I tried to fix this issue. And so cc'd people on cover-letter and the important patch they must check. > Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn....@linaro.org> Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
