On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Move the cond_resched() check for CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY into
> the low level copy_*_user code. This avoids some code bloat and
> makes check much more efficient by avoiding unnecessary function calls.
May I suggest going one step further, and just removing the
cond_resched() _entirely_, leaving just the debug test?
There really is zero reason for doing a cond_resched() for user
accesses. If they take a page fault, then yes, by all means do that
(and maybe we should add one to the page fault trap if we don't have
it already), but without a page fault they really aren't that
expensive.
We do many more expensive things without any cond_resched(), and doing
that cond_resched() really doesn't make much sense *unless* there's a
big expensive loop involved.
Most of this series looks fine, but I really think that we
could/should just take that extra step, and say "no, user accesses
don't imply that we need to check for scheduling".
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
