Richard Gooch wrote: > > Jeff Garzik writes: > > > > I'm sorry but this is a regression, plain and simple. > > > > Previous versons of Linux have worked great on diskless workstations > > with NO swap. > > > > Swap is "extra space to be used if we have it" and nothing else. > > Sure. But Linux still works without swap. It's just that if you *do* > have swap, it works best with 2* RAM. Yes, but that's not the point of the discussion. Currently 2*RAM is more of a requirement than a recommendation. -- Jeff Garzik | Andre the Giant has a posse. Building 1024 | MandrakeSoft | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: VM Report was:Re: Break 2.4 VM in... Rik van Riel
- Re: VM Report was:Re: Break 2.4 VM in... Mike Galbraith
- Re: VM Report was:Re: Break 2.4 VM in... Tobias Ringstrom
- Re: VM Report was:Re: Break 2.4 VM in... Mike Galbraith
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Daniel Phillips
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Jonathan Morton
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Richard Gooch
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Christian Bornträger
- Requirement: swap = RAM x 2.5 ?? Jeff Garzik
- Re: Requirement: swap = RAM x 2.5 ?? Richard Gooch
- Re: Requirement: swap = RAM x 2.5 ?? Jeff Garzik
- Re: Requirement: swap = RAM x 2.5 ?? Richard Gooch
- Re: Requirement: swap = RAM x 2.5 ?? Mike Galbraith
- Re: Requirement: swap = RAM x 2.5 ?? Greg Hennessy
- Re: Requirement: swap = RAM x 2.5 ?? Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Requirement: swap = RAM x 2.5 ?? Jan Harkes
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Ben Greear
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Derek Glidden
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps José Luis Domingo López
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Disconnect
- Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Derek Glidden