On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:56 +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > >> The right answer to the code is to config it out and then you don't have > >> to worry about it one way or another. [] > > Hmm... do you mean you spend 5 minutes to get a conclusion ? if so, > > better not use word 'seems' which is not a suitable word appeared in > > the results, proofs or conclusions. [] > You are too bad in english to do kernel development. You don't seem to > know how to communicate in english...
I don't think that's true. For instance, pessimization is a pretty obscure word. Most native English speakers could probably guess what it meant, but I couldn't hold any low opinion of non-native speaker that asked "what does that mean". The code communicates just fine. Chen Gang could be a bit more careful when making significant changes to core kernel facilities. (said the guy that broke just printk) I think the fluent English speakers can be tolerant reasonably well when the code is correct and compelling (and correct). cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
