From: Paul Moore <pmo...@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:34:07 -0400
> On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:14:34 PM Cong Wang wrote: >> From: Cong Wang <amw...@redhat.com> >> >> selinux has some similar definition like union inet_addr, >> it can re-use the generic union inet_addr too. >> >> Cc: James Morris <james.l.mor...@oracle.com> >> Cc: Stephen Smalley <s...@tycho.nsa.gov> >> Cc: Eric Paris <epa...@parisplace.org> >> Cc: Paul Moore <pmo...@redhat.com> >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-security-mod...@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amw...@redhat.com> > > Perhaps I'm confusing this with another patch but I though DaveM said he > wasn't going to merge these patches? I didn't like how he added completely unused bloat to various datastructures because he unconditionally put a port field into there. He removed that problem this time, but there are still a lot of things I don't like about this patch series. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
