On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 11:30 +0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:09:55AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Lots of "maintainers" don't apply patches.
> I have no idea what you are meaning here.
Just that maintainers aren't necessarily appliers.
In fact, most aren't.
> Add netdev to the L: list as well.
I don't think it's necessary.
get_maintainers already shows that via the
NETWORKING DRIVERS section F: drivers/net/
Maybe adding
W: http://www.linux-usb.org/usbnet
might be useful, but it seems pretty out of date.
btw: This is a similar section to what I suggested.
No named "maintainer"
NETWORKING DRIVERS
L: net...@vger.kernel.org
W: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net
Q: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/
T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git
T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
S: Odd Fixes
F: drivers/net/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
