Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:36:41AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> With the 64-bit requirement removed from virt CPU accounting, >> allow ARM platforms to enable it. >> >> Cc: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> index 136f263..7850612 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ config ARM >> select OLD_SIGSUSPEND3 >> select OLD_SIGACTION >> select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING >> + select HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING > > I think you got confused here. HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING is the arch capability > for VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE, not for VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN that only > requires > support for context tracking.
Yes, I am confused. :/ > That's my bad, all those names start to be confusing now. > The VIRT based Kconfig naming is a bit weird, that doesn't really reflect > what the feature > is doing. "Virtual cputime accounting" just doesn't give any clue, except > perhaps suggesting > the stuff deals with virtualization while it actually has nothing to do with. > I don't even know what virtual refers to here. > > Same goes for vtime based APIs. In fact I just based my work on the legacy > that was > there and expanded further the non-sense ;-) > > I'll need to do a big renaming one day. > > But to begin with I should rename > s/HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING/HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE. OK, I just tested and I can indeed drop this patch. Thanks for clarifying, Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
