On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:02:50PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:05:51PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:31:59PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > When we try to get a huge page with avoid_reserve, we don't consume > > > a reserved page. So it is treated like as non-reserve case. > > > > This patch will be completely overwritten with 9/18. > > So is this patch necessary? > > Yes. This is a bug fix, so should be separate. > When we try to allocate with avoid_reserve, we don't use reserved page pool. > So, hugepage_subpool_get_pages() should be called and returned if failed. > > If we merge these into one, we cannot know that there exists a bug.
OK, so you can merge this with the subpool accounting fix in 6/18 as one fix. Thanks, Naoya -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
