On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:16:44PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:

> Pointing it to a dummy work callback is cleaner than taking
> special cases in the code to bypass the flush_delayed_work_sync().

Why is this better than pointing at the normal work that you'd expect to
be used there?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to